I had a lot of fun at this flick, Ben Stein’s cold-hard facts vs. the stupid Darwinian’s fascist policies really brought the whole issue into an objective light.*

* denotes sarcasm. Although I did have a lot of fun. Laughing aloud and all. The gross use of stock footage from propaganda films, extreme editing and ridiculous claims that Darwin caused the Holocaust [yes, that's an actual line of reasoning from the film] make this film hard to take seriously. The whole time, I was wondering. What really are the claims about Intelligent Design? But they never brought those to the table, not point by point. In the end, a documentary about Intelligent Design should probably make some statements [with evidence] about why ID should be a viable hypothesis in the scientific community, so the scientific community doesn’t consider it to be mere heresay. But instead, it’s probably a better idea to just whine about how science is against them and pander to the heart-strings of people and paint science as a big bully with a closed mind.*

Science doesn’t have a mind. It has a process. If you don’t meet the requirements for passing the steps in that process, you get rejected. ID was finished the momenth it couldn’t provide any evidence to backup any of its claims. I don’t care how many black-and-white stock footage clips you throw at us in a vain attempt to equate the expelled IDers with the millions of persecuted and silenced voices throughout our history. They do have a voice, that voice’s basis belongs in philosophy, not science. And that is that.

Even Richard Dawkins entertained the possibility that Intelligent Design may be true, but it also may be true that every living thing is actually posing as something else, and in actuality they are all blue yaks hiding from me and this is just one big dream world thought up by a pink carnation flower. Yes, that is a possibility. Now hold your breath while I gather evidence to support that hypothesis.